Some political organizations are setting up websites that look like they are run by news organizations, but instead of objective news they deliver heavy doses of partisan propaganda.
The National Republican Congressional Committee is one such group, and it is targeting U.S. Rep. Collin Peterson, who has represented western Minnesota for two dozen years, and U.S. Rep. Rick Nolan, who serves northeastern and east-central Minnesota.
The sites — called “Moorhead Update” and “Duluth Update” — are at www.electionupdate2014.com/mn07update70 and www.electionupdate2014.com/mn08update70.
The anti-Peterson site leads with the headline “Collin Peterson: 20 Years in Washington on the taxpayer’s dime” while the site against Nolan proclaims “Nolan’s commitment to 2nd amendment questioned.” Neither headline links to a real news story.
The National Journal first reported on the 20-plus anti-Democratic candidate sites, which only at the very bottom, in small print, reveal: “Paid for by the National Republican Congressional Committee and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.”
“This is a new and effective way to disseminate information to voters who are interested in learning the truth about these Democratic candidates,” Andrea Bozek of the GOP group told National Journal.
“We believe this is the most effective way to present information to leave a lasting impact on voters,” Bozek said.
The Politico Website opined that “the tactic is legal, if ethically sketchy.”
Earlier this year, the Republican committee launched collinpeterson2014.com. Under a big headline “Collin Peterson for Congress,” came: “Washington is broken, and Collin Peterson is part of the problem.” It was an effort to raise money.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee did not like the tactic, saying that “after coming under fire earlier this year for tricking voters into donating money against their will, it comes as no surprise that the NRCC is looking for yet another deceptive scheme to distract voters from their flawed priorities and record low approval rating.”
McFadden backs tax? No
First Mike McFadden said he could accept Chinese steel in an oil pipeline construction project, then a week later he said he could support a higher federal fuel tax.
The Republican has been campaigning for U.S. Senate against incumbent Democrat Al Franken for more than a year, but still has some rough corners to smooth.
Mark Sommerhauser of the St. Cloud Times was one of a handful of reporters who covered McFadden’s transportation tax comments:
“Responding to a Times reporter’s question after a campaign event Wednesday at the St. Cloud Area Chamber of Commerce, he said he’d consider supporting an increase in the federal fuel tax to resolve a looming shortfall in federal transportation funds.
“Moments later, McFadden reversed course, saying he doesn’t support increasing the fuel tax. He later told the Times he misspoke in his initial remarks.”
A Republican misspeaking about a tax increase is a tough mistake. So is the comment about accepting Chinese steel in a state where taconite, which can be turned into steel, is a major resource.
The steel comment has gained traction on the Iron Range, where McFadden and other Republicans have worked to get support in the normally Democratic area. Saying something that could be perceived as anti-American steel could hurt.
McFadden’s initial comments to the Times about being open to increasing the federal fuel tax to bolster the Highway Trust Fund also included his feeling that such an increase only could be acceptable if there also was a tax decrease involved.
After talking to an aide, he told reporters: “I just want to reiterate that I will not support raising the gas tax.”
June primary discussed
Tuesday’s low primary election turnout could produce new debate about moving the primary to June, when some think more people would vote.
About 10 percent of eligible Minnesota voters cast ballots Tuesday. The latest count shows there were fewer than 400,000 voters, compared to more than 3 million for a good general election.
Republican Chairman Keith Downey and DFL Chairman Ken Martin have discussed the possibility of moving the primary up to June. It used to be in September and the last couple of elections has been in August because many in politics felt that September to early November was too little time to wage a general election campaign.
Many people are on vacation and most are not paying attention to politics before the State Fair in late August. Martin said more might pay attention in June.
But many lawmakers running for re-election do not like June because it comes close on the heels of their legislative session that usually ends in mid- to late-May. That gives them little time to campaign and raise money.
A big difference
One political wag noted after the primary election that Matt Entenza spent nearly $700,000 in his race for state auditor while Jack Shepard spent little, if anything, on his run for U.S. Senate.
They got about the same percentage of votes in their races.
The big difference? While Entenza spent the last few weeks traveling the state spending money freely, Shepard was in Italy, where he lives to avoid Minnesota warrants for his arrest on arson-related charges.
Big money, big problem?
Chairman Ken Martin of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party warned Republican Mike McFadden that rich people who partially self-finance campaigns may not be successful.
Martin pointed out that Matt Entenza paid for much of the expense of his state auditor’s race, and lost. Republican Scott Honour did the same for his governor campaign, with the same result.
McFadden is a wealthy businessman and is expected to dump some of his own money into his challenge to U.S. Sen. Al Franken.
Honour and Entenza “tried to buy the election,” Martin said.
What the chairman did not say was that Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton financed much of his own campaign four years ago, and won.